NEELAM TANEJA PERRY Vs. ROBERT ROCKY ROCHFORD, et al
| Event Date | Event Description | DocLink |
|---|---|---|
| < 1 2 3 4 | ||
| 10/1/2024 | NOTICE OF APPEAL RECORDED | NOTICE OF APPEAL RECORDED (1) |
| 12/12/2024 | RECEIPT FOR CASE TRANSFER | Case Transfer Receipt (1) |
| 12/16/2024 | RETURNED FROM POST OFFICE 2D2024-2316 | RETURNED FROM POST OFFICE (1) |
| 12/18/2024 | CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT RETURNED 1_9214890194038391397118_202412_24-003892-CI.pdf | CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT RETURNED (1) |
| 12/18/2024 | CERTIFICATE OF CLERK RE NON PAYMENT $108.50 2D2024-2316 | AP-CLK CERT-SERVICE CHARGE RECORD (1) |
| 12/23/2024 | DCA ORDER INITIAL BRIEF DUE APPELLANT SHALL SERVE THE INITIAL BRIEF WITHIN TWENTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, OR THIS APPEAL WILL BE SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE BASED ON FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. 2D2024-2316 | DCA ORDER INITIAL BRIEF DUE (1) |
| 12/23/2024 | RECEIPT (TRANSFER) | RECEIPT (1) |
| 12/30/2024 | RETURNED FROM POST OFFICE 2D2024-2316 | RETURNED FROM POST OFFICE (1) |
| 2/12/2025 | DCA ORDER APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE INITIAL BRIEF SHALL BE SERVED BY MARCH 10, 2025. HOWEVER, FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ARE UNLIKELY TO RECEIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION. TO THE EXTENT APPELLANT IS WAITING FOR TRANSMISSION OF THE REOCRD ON APPEAL, THIS COURT NOTES THAT THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT HAS CERTIFIED TO THIS COURT THAT THIS RECORD HAS NOT BEEN TRANSMITTED FOR REVIEW DUE TO THE NON-PAYMENT OF A STATUTORY SERVICE CHARGE. 2D2024-2316 | DCA ORDER (1) |
| 3/20/2025 | DCA ORDER APPELLANT'S MOTION TO WAIVE RECORD IN APPEAL FEES IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO APPELLANT SEEKING THE APPROPRIATE RELIEF IN THE CIRCUIT COURT. APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL IS DENIED. 2D2024-2316 | DCA ORDER (1) |
| 3/21/2025 | MOTION TO WAIVE RECORD IN APPEAL FEES | MOTION (1) |
| 3/21/2025 | EXHIBIT - COPY APPLICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF CIVIL INDIGENT STATUS DATED 08/29/2024 | EXHIBIT (1) |
| 4/10/2025 | ORDER DENYING MOTION TO WAIVE APPEAL FEES | ORDER DENYING (1) |
| 5/14/2025 | DCA ORDER APPEAL DISMISSED APPELLEES' JULIE MARCUS AND AMANDA COFFEY'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED, AND THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS FROM A NONFINAL, NONAPPEALABLE ORDER. APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS MOOT. 2D2024-2316 | DCA ORDER APPEAL DISMISSED (1) |
| 6/18/2025 | APPEAL CLERK'S WORKSHEET WITH ATTACHMENT 2D2024-2316 | APPEAL CLERK'S WORKSHEET WITH ATTACHMENT (1) |